|
California Modifies Its Alternative
Workweek Schedule Rules
February 25, 2009
Summary
Last Friday, Governor Schwarzenegger signed a
bill that
modifies the rules regarding alternative workweek schedules.
The new law becomes effective in May of 2009, and is intended to give employers and employees more
flexibility in utilizing alternative workweek schedule
arrangements by permitting an additional scheduling option for
employers, and by permitting employees to move between various
schedule options as their personal needs may dictate. While
the improvements are best described as modest, this new
law does make alternative workweek schedules more attractive
for some employers.
Details
Almost 10 years ago, California reinstated
daily overtime after a two year hiatus. The law that did so
(AB60), also re-introduced the concept of alternative workweek
schedules (AWS). In short, the law permits schedules that
include shifts of greater than 8-hours, but without employees
being entitled to any overtime premium. For example, under an
AWS, employees can work four 10-hour shifts, rather than five
8-hour shifts, and not be paid daily overtime. Such
arrangements must be proposed by the employer, and approved by
2/3 of the employees in the designated work unit in a secret
ballot election. While facially attractive, the law
included
sufficient drawbacks that have prevented widespread use of AWS
agreements.
One feature of the AWS rules is the option of
providing employees with a menu of alternative schedules to
choose from. For example, employees might be permitted to
select either four 10-hour shifts per week, or four 9-hour
shifts and one 4-hour shift. However, there were significant
restrictions on this menu option. The restrictions
included a
prohibition of including 8-hour shifts within the menu of
options, and the lack of any ability for employees
to regularly adjust their option selections.
This new law attempts to make AWS menu
options more palatable. To do so, it amends Labor Code
section 511 to provide that:
1. An AWS menu of work schedule options
may include a regular schedule of 8-hour days. Employees
selecting this option would be subject to the daily overtime
requirements that apply to employees not subject to an AWS
agreement.
2. Employees who adopt an AWS agreement
with a menu of options may, with their employer's consent,
move from one schedule to another on a weekly basis.
Additionally, the new law amends Section 511
to define the term "work unit," which is the group of
employees that can be covered by an AWS agreement. "Work
unit" is broadly defined as "a division, a department, a job
classification, a shift, a separate physical location, or a
recognized subdivision thereof." The law also notes that a
single individual employee may be a work unit "as long as the
criteria for an identifiable work unit" is met. In other
words, if the employee is the only person in his or her job
classification, shift, or physical location, s/he can have
his or her own AWS agreement.
What This Means
This new law makes the AWS menu of options
alternative a bit more user friendly. It allows greater
flexibility to employers in the types of shifts that can be
included (i.e. 8-hour shifts) and to employees in being
allowed (with employer approval) to move between AWS options.
As a result, in some circumstances, this in an alternative
worth reviewing. If an employer already has an AWS with a
menu of options, it may (depending on the language of the
original agreement) need to hold a new AWS election to take
advantage of this change in the law.
Employers should keep in mind that AWS
arrangements work best when employees' work schedules are well
established. This is because the primary deterrent to the use
of AWS agreements remains the fact that when an employer
requires (and in some circumstances, even permits) an employee
to work on a workday that is not part of the employees regular
schedule, the employer must pay the employee time and
one-half his or her regular rate of pay for all hours worked
up to 8, and double time for hours worked in excess of 8, on
that workday. Thus, employers considering an AWS agreement
should determine their expected need for employees to work on
days other than their regularly scheduled workdays before
pursuing this option.
This e-update was authored by
Michael
Sullivan and
Brenda
Kasper. For more information, or questions, please contact
Mr. Sullivan, Ms. Kasper or any Paul, Plevin attorney at (619)
237-5200
Was this message forwarded to you by a friend?
CLICK HERE to
subscribe to the e-update mailing list.
CLICK
HERE to find out about Paul, Plevin's employer training programs
CLICK
HERE to read other Employment Law E-Updates
|